KICKER PROBLEMS
Holdem is often a game of kickers. When a hand flops the top pair and gets action that reaches a showdown, the result is often based on which hand has the best kicker with its top pair.
For example, if you have a hand like K 
6 
, get a free ride to see the flop from the big blind, and get a flop of k 
8 
3 , you have to consider the value of that 6 when compared with the likely kicker of any other player that might have a King.
This kind of hand is potentially in big trouble. The conventional approach to playing this kind of situation is based on a hand-domination perspective.
The conventional recommendation is to check the hand and call if someone bets. This does two things-it minimizes your losses when you are beaten by another King with a better kicker while improving your profits by inciting other players to bet as a odds.
In a tight game, the hand-domination perspective does lead you to the best course of action. You should check and call if someone bets.
You should probably not call if there is a bet and a raise, although it actually turns out that checking and calling a raise rather than folding to a raise is not a large error. It only costs you a few pennies on average.
In very loose games, this popular wisdom just doesn’t hold up.
In a very loose game, betting the poker hand straightforwardly, and calling if anyone raises, makes almost twice as much money in the long run as checking and calling. This is not the popular wisdom.
Most players would feel very uncomfortable if they bet this top pair with a weak kicker and got raised when the flop had no draws that someone may be raising on. Betting and calling is the right thing to do against a field of loose or very loose players.
The reason for this is that in very loose games you are more likely to have other players with 3s and 8s than Kings in their hands.
In a loose game, your opponents are more likely to have two kinds of hands than are likely in a tight game.
A hand such as K 2 is much more likely to be played by an opponent in a loose game, and a hand such as 8 6 is also much more likely to be played.
You’ll get action, maybe even a raise from hands like that, if you bet out your top pair with a weak kicker in a loose game.
In a tight game, players aren’t likely to be holding those kinds of hands on the flop.
Of course, even in a loose poker game, you are probably beaten if you get raised, but the chances are good enough that you are not beaten to make it worth calling a raise.
The pot will be large enough to hold onto that hand because there are enough worse hands that loose players might raise with to make it pay off.
Don’t expect to win most of the pots by doing this, but do expect to win most of the money eventually.
In more typical games, the two plays, betting versus checking and calling, are about equivalent in terms of the amount of money made.
The best play is to probably check and call in a typical game. It makes about the same money as betting and does so with a little less risk.
The general lesson here is to play your top pairs more aggressively in loose games while playing top pairs with weak kickers more passively in tight games.
This is a major differences in how a common situation should be played differently under different game conditions.
I think it illustrates how important it is to think in terms of the online poker game conditions and the kinds of hands your opponents are likely to have rather than thinking in terms of only your own hand.
Pick the Right Table / Picking a Seat / Theories of Poker / Betting Theory: The Odds
A Theory of Starting Hand Value
A Theory of Flop Play: Counting Outs and Evaluating Draws
The Dynamics of Game Conditions / Table Image / Player Stereotypes
Women and Poker / Spread-Limit Games / Double Bet on the End Games / Kill Games
Short-handed Games / Tournaments / No-limit and Pot-Limit Poker
